Close Menu
Crypto Valley Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Crypto Valley Journal
    • Hot Topics
      • News
      • Minds
    • Focus
      • Background
      • Blockchain
      • Legal & Compliance
      • Non-Fungible Token (NFTs)
    • Investing
      • Markets
      • Financial Products
      • Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
      • Exchange overview
    • Education
      • Basics
      • Glossary
      • Politicians on crypto
    • Statistics
      • Bitcoin-ETF-Flows
      • Ethereum-ETF-Flows
      • Crypto market data
      • On-chain data
    • Academy
      • Overview
      • Part 1: Blockchain
      • Part 2: Money
      • Part 3: Bitcoin
      • Part 4: Cryptocurrencies
      • Part 5: Decentralized Finance
      • Part 6: Investing
    • English
      • Deutsch
    Crypto Valley Journal
    You are at:Home » Education » Basics » Automated market makers as decentralized portfolio managers
    Automated market makers manage liquidity pools like rule-based portfolios, with direct consequences for impermanent loss and hedging.

    Automated market makers as decentralized portfolio managers

    0
    By Dr. Marcus Wunsch on 8. October 2026 Basics

    Decentralized exchanges are often measured by trading volume, fees and total value locked (TVL). However, that view falls short. The real progress lies deeper: automated market makers (AMMs) replace the traditional order book with a transparent calculation rule.

    This rule sets the price at which two digital assets can be swapped. With every trade, it also changes the composition of the liquidity pool automatically. Anyone who provides capital to such a pool is therefore doing more than mere "liquidity provision." In fact, they hold a rule-based portfolio. If the market buys heavily into one token, the pool gives up part of it. At the same time, it receives more of the other token. When the relative price falls, the opposite happens. In effect, the mechanism works like automatic portfolio rebalancing.

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    The best articles of the week, directly delivered into your mailbox.

    What liquidity providers hold in automated market makers

    Liquidity provision in AMMs enables portfolio management with fixed target weights. This becomes especially clear with geometric mean market makers, as known from Balancer-like models. There, the pool follows a weighting rule: it keeps restoring the desired relative shares of its assets. The smart contract thus takes over a task that traditional asset management steers deliberately. It sells assets that have risen in relative terms and buys those that have fallen.

    From this perspective, the term "impermanent loss" loses some of its mystique. It does not describe a puzzling DeFi phenomenon. Instead, it refers to the difference between two strategies. One strategy is simply holding the original tokens. The other is the automatic rebalancing within the pool. When a token rises sharply, buy-and-hold often looks better in hindsight. That is because the pool has meanwhile sold part of the winner.

    For professional investors, this framing matters. Liquidity provision is not an interest-bearing investment or a risk-free source of ongoing fee income. Its results depend heavily on price swings and arbitrage. Therefore, the level of the trading fee is not the only decisive factor. Market volatility, trading activity and the efficiency of arbitrage count as well. So does the question of how well investors can hedge the position.

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    The best articles of the week, directly delivered into your mailbox.

    How to hedge impermanent loss

    Mathematical analysis shows that investors do not simply have to accept the risk. Impermanent loss correlates closely with the realized volatility of the price. Under idealized conditions, instruments known from traditional derivatives markets can hedge it, in particular weighted variance swaps. This makes a seemingly new DeFi phenomenon readable as a familiar financial risk: the sale of volatility.

    Things become truly practical once trading fees enter the picture. Fees are not only a source of income. They also change the market mechanism within the AMM. After all, fees are what creates a bid-ask spread in the pool in the first place. Consequently, the pool price does not have to match the price on other trading venues at every moment. Under continuous price movements, the opportunity cost can disappear or even turn into a gain. The benchmark here is a self-financing portfolio with fixed weights. In practice, this remains an approximation, because markets move in jumps and transactions cannot occur continuously.

    Market-neutral strategies for liquidity providers

    Some approaches go a step further and do not bet on rising or falling token prices. Rather, they aim to keep the value of the position as stable as possible. In addition, they seek to earn income from trading fees and from the hedge. Investors can build such strategies with options and futures. In practice, this is demanding. It requires suitable maturities, sufficiently liquid strike prices and enough collateral. Moreover, the capital requirement can be significantly higher than the amount in the pool. In return, the hedging structure itself can generate income, for example through forward premiums or funding rates.

    AMMs thus offer more than innovative trading infrastructure. They are automated portfolio managers that translate investment rules into smart contracts. In doing so, they make rule-based asset management transparent and accessible around the clock.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Telegram WhatsApp

    About the author

    Dr. Marcus Wunsch
    Dr. Marcus Wunsch
    • Website
    • LinkedIn

    Dr. Marcus Wunsch is a lecturer at the Institute for Wealth and Asset Management at the ZHAW School of Management and Law and heads the CAS in Blockchain & Decentralised Finance. His research focuses on the intersection of decentralised finance, financial mathematics and quantitative investment strategies. Previously, he worked as Head of Risk Management at Quantica Capital and as a risk specialist at UBS.

    Related Articles

    Unit bias in crypto: Why cheap coins mislead investors

    The Chainalysis Crypto Crime Report puts illicit activity below 1% of on-chain volume, countering the myth of Bitcoin as a criminal currency.

    Myth: Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies mainly serve criminal activity

    Zcash hides transaction data with zk-SNARK proofs and now sits between a US spot ETF listing and the EU privacy coin ban of 2027.

    What is the privacy coin Zcash (ZEC)?

    Comments are closed.

    Automated market makers manage liquidity pools like rule-based portfolios, with direct consequences for impermanent loss and hedging.
    8. October 2026

    Automated market makers as decentralized portfolio managers

    Igloo, the parent company of Pudgy Penguins, will shut down Abstract in December and forgo a token after losing tens of millions.
    7. October 2026

    Pudgy Penguins shuts down Ethereum layer 2 Abstract

    FinCEN withdraws its 2023 crypto mixing rule and its 2020 unhosted wallet proposal, while the EU and Switzerland require proof of wallet ownership.
    6. October 2026

    FinCEN abandons its planned crypto travel rule

    twitter image button instagram image button linkedin image button youtube image button

    About Crypto Valley Journal
    About Crypto Valley Journal

    On the pulse of the movement

    • Academy
    • Contact
    • Advertising
    • About us
    • Partner
    • Imprint
    • Privacy
    • Disclaimer
    Search
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.