Close Menu
Crypto Valley Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Crypto Valley Journal
    • Hot Topics
      • News
      • Minds
    • Focus
      • Background
      • Blockchain
      • Legal & Compliance
      • Non-Fungible Token (NFTs)
    • Investing
      • Markets
      • Financial Products
      • Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
      • Exchange overview
    • Education
      • Basics
      • Glossary
      • Politicians on crypto
    • Statistics
      • Bitcoin-ETF-Flows
      • Ethereum-ETF-Flows
      • Crypto market data
      • On-chain data
    • Academy
      • Overview
      • Part 1: Blockchain
      • Part 2: Money
      • Part 3: Bitcoin
      • Part 4: Cryptocurrencies
      • Part 5: Decentralized Finance
      • Part 6: Investing
    • English
      • Deutsch
    Crypto Valley Journal
    You are at:Home»Focus»Background»AWS outage: A centralized failure with a decentralized solution

    AWS outage: A centralized failure with a decentralized solution

    By 21Shares Research on 30. October 2025 Background

    2 weeks ago, Amazon Web Services suffered a major failure at its Virginia data center, taking down large parts of the internet for more than 15 hours. Websites, apps, and even some crypto platforms went dark, not because blockchains stopped working, but because their front ends, APIs, and databases were hosted on AWS.

    The main culprit: Centralization. When one company’s servers fail, the effects ripple across the web. Building a more resilient internet requires distributed storage and delivery systems like IPFS, Filecoin, and Arweave, which spread data across thousands of independent machines instead of a few corporate data centers.

    How does decentralized storage work?

    The InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) retrieves data by what it is rather than where it is. Each file has a unique content ID derived from its data and can be fetched from any node that stores it. If an AWS region goes down, IPFS can still deliver the same file from other nodes worldwide, removing a single point of failure.

    Filecoin builds on IPFS with a global marketplace for storage. Providers earn tokens for hosting data and must prove they still hold it through cryptographic checks. Users can pay for faster access from nearby nodes, combining affordability with redundancy. If one provider fails, others can still serve the same files.

    Another network, Arweave, focuses on permanent data storage. It is ideal for app front ends, public records, or documentation that must never disappear. Files uploaded to Arweave remain accessible indefinitely through a global peer network. Together, these systems make outages an inconvenience rather than a catastrophe.

    A hidden weakness in crypto infrastructure

    The outage exposed a hard truth: even “decentralized” systems often depend on centralized infrastructure. Wallets, decentralized apps, and exchanges rely on RPC nodes (gateways that connect to blockchain data), many of which are concentrated on AWS and Google Cloud.

    How dependent are blockchains on AWS? / Source: AWSBlockchainTracker, 21Shares

    When AWS went down, networks such as Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum suffered disruptions because their RPC providers were unreachable. Blocks kept producing, but users couldn’t interact with them. If the failure of one company can interrupt access to most crypto networks, the system isn’t truly decentralized.

    How did the AWS outage affect blockchain nodes? / Source: AWSBlockchainTracker, 21Shares

    Decentralized storage networks like IPFS and Filecoin can mitigate this risk by hosting node data and access points across many independent providers.

    What could have stayed online

    If more apps had used decentralized storage, much of the web could have remained functional. Websites, metadata, and documentation hosted on IPFS or Arweave would still have loaded. Even if users couldn’t transact, they could still open apps, view cached data, and stay informed instead of being completely locked out.

    These networks can also act as live backups. Apps can periodically store read-only snapshots or cached data on Filecoin or Arweave, allowing them to display balances, user profiles, or recent transactions even when databases fail. This does not replace traditional cloud infrastructure, but it turns total outages into manageable slowdowns.

    Despite clear advantages, decentralized storage isn’t mainstream yet. Cloud platforms like AWS remain faster, cheaper for scale, and easier to manage. Decentralized networks can be slower for dynamic data, and developers face added complexity in managing content IDs, storage deals, and costs. Awareness is another barrier. Many crypto teams focus on smart contracts and tokens rather than on where their data lives. Evolving pricing models and token economics also make long-term planning difficult.

    So, what’s the decentralized solution for this centralized problem?

    Hybrid tools now combine the reliability of the cloud with the resilience of decentralized networks. Apps can publish to both cloud and decentralized networks at once, with automatic fallback if the cloud origin fails. Additionally, modern software adapters now let developers integrate IPFS or Arweave with just a few lines of code.

    • Filebase offers S3-compatible uploads that automatically store files on IPFS.
    • Cloudflare and the IPFS Foundation maintain high-performance gateways linking browsers to decentralized content.
    • On Arweave, tools like Irys (formerly Bundlr) batch uploads for faster and cheaper permanent storage.

    The October 2025 outage was a clear reminder that the internet remains too centralized. Filecoin, Arweave, and IPFS offer a practical path toward a stronger, more resilient web. IPFS ensures that data can come from many sources. Filecoin provides durable and verifiable storage. Arweave keeps critical data online permanently.

    If hybrid tools mature and adoption grows, the next major outage should hopefully not take the web down with it. Apps will stay live, users will stay connected, and the decentralized web will finally live up to its name.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Telegram WhatsApp

    About the author

    21Shares Research
    • Website

    The 21Shares Research team provides world-class, data-driven insights into the crypto asset market. Our mission is to improve the professionalism, transparency, and accountability of actors and institutions within the industry whilst helping educate investors. To do this we produce monthly institutional-grade research on the most important topics within the industry.

    Related Articles

    Analysis by Bitget Research on Bitcoin quantum computing risks, ECDSA exposure, NIST post-quantum standards, and BIP-360 migration paths.

    Bitcoin quantum computing: What recent developments mean for network security

    XRPL validator analyzes quantum risk: only 0.03% of XRP supply is exposed, compared to up to 35% for Bitcoin. Google sets 2029 deadline.

    Quantum risk: Is XRP more secure than Bitcoin?

    Power Shift in Crypto Exchanges: Retail Overtakes Institutional

    Trump would sign the CLARITY Act immediately. But the Senate is blocking it, and a May deadline could push the law back to 2030.
    27. April 2026

    Trump wants to sign CLARITY Act immediately, but chances drop to 50%

    CVJ.CH Weekly review calendar week
    25. April 2026

    Weekly review calendar week 17 – 2026

    JPMorgan warns: Recurring DeFi exploits and stagnant ETH-denominated TVL curb institutional engagement in the DeFi sector.
    24. April 2026

    JPMorgan: DeFi hacks and TVL losses weigh on institutional investors

    twitter image button instagram image button linkedin image button youtube image button

    About Crypto Valley Journal
    About Crypto Valley Journal

    On the pulse of the movement

    • Academy
    • Contact
    • Advertising
    • About us
    • Partner
    • Imprint
    • Privacy
    • Disclaimer
    Search

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.