Close Menu
Crypto Valley Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Crypto Valley Journal
    • Hot Topics
      • News
      • Minds
    • Focus
      • Background
      • Blockchain
      • Legal & Compliance
      • Non-Fungible Token (NFTs)
    • Investing
      • Markets
      • Financial Products
      • Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
      • Exchange overview
    • Education
      • Basics
      • Glossary
      • Politicians on crypto
    • Statistics
      • Bitcoin-ETF-Flows
      • Ethereum-ETF-Flows
      • Crypto market data
      • On-chain data
    • Academy
      • Overview
      • Part 1: Blockchain
      • Part 2: Money
      • Part 3: Bitcoin
      • Part 4: Cryptocurrencies
      • Part 5: Decentralized Finance
      • Part 6: Investing
    • English
      • Deutsch
    Crypto Valley Journal
    You are at:Home»Focus»Background»Secure crypto asset custody cannot rely on personal responsibility alone
    Secure crypto asset custody cannot rely on personal responsibility alone

    Secure crypto asset custody cannot rely on personal responsibility alone

    By Marc Taverner on 28. September 2023 Background

    In the wake of FTX’s collapse, the crypto asset community returned to a familiar motto: “Not your keys, not your crypto.” It was meant to reassure one another that what Sam Bankman-Fried did couldn’t have happened to us if we had the proper custody in place. This simply isn’t true in this day and age.

    As a sector, we applaud new financial products, like ETFs getting approved and we are happy to see more retailers and companies accepting crypto assets. But for mass adoption to continue, secure custody has to be more than an individual effort. Simply holding keys doesn’t work for large-scale asset management, nor will it pass the most basic of security audits. We need a diverse ecosystem of custody options - one of which can remain sole custodial control for the “not your keys, not your crypto” crowd.

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    The best articles of the week, directly delivered into your mailbox.

    What does secure crypto custody mean?

    Asset managers (from individual advisors to large brokerages and banks) are experts in their field - managing and growing investments to maximise returns. Their proficiency lies in understanding the market, identifying opportunities, and making calculated decisions. Their work, whether for individuals, family offices, or pension funds, is foundational to the financial system we all use. And if we want these providers to offer avenues into digital assets, it follows that they need a way to hold these assets securely - especially if we, individually, are not comfortable doing so.

    Yet, returning to the question of the best way to approach custody: Asking these managers to create their own secure crypto custody program is akin to asking them to conduct KYC with only someone's first name, and no internet access. The professional financial ecosystem relies on partners, especially for security and compliance. Not only is it more efficient and secure for asset managers to work with secure custody providers, but these partners are far more expert at putting the robust security measures in place to protect the digital assets. This security is the ultimate end goal of "not your keys, not your crypto."

    Setting aside the objections to external custody providers, the requirement of asset managers to hold cryptographic keys is actually against the ethos of secure self-custody. If owning the key equals owning the crypto, that means who has keys has full control and responsibility. If the asset manager holds the key in a secure custody process, it contradicts this principle as the client does not have direct control over their own digital assets. Conversely, if the client retains the keys, it implies that the asset manager isn't truly managing anything, leading to potential inefficiencies and missed opportunities for asset growth. Striking the right balance between secure custody and maintaining clients' independence over their cryptocurrencies is challenging, reinforcing the need for specialised crypto custody services.

    Ray Dalio’s Bridgewater Associates Minds

    Star investor Ray Dalio considers Bitcoin inferior to gold

    Analysis by Bitget Research on Bitcoin quantum computing risks, ECDSA exposure, NIST post-quantum standards, and BIP-360 migration paths. Background

    Bitcoin quantum computing: What recent developments mean for network security

    JPMorgan warns: Recurring DeFi exploits and stagnant ETH-denominated TVL curb institutional engagement in the DeFi sector. DeFi

    JPMorgan: DeFi hacks and TVL losses weigh on institutional investors

    Basics

    Unit bias in crypto: Why cheap coins mislead investors

    Ray Dalio’s Bridgewater Associates Minds

    Star investor Ray Dalio considers Bitcoin inferior to gold

    Analysis by Bitget Research on Bitcoin quantum computing risks, ECDSA exposure, NIST post-quantum standards, and BIP-360 migration paths. Background

    Bitcoin quantum computing: What recent developments mean for network security

    The road ahead for modern crypto asset custody

    In the coming year, I expect that we'll see continued expansion of the custody services ecosystem. As more providers enter the market, we need to remain vigilant against bad actors and insecure, inadequate services. If you are comfortable holding your own keys, then continue to do so. If you are looking for a secure custody provider, look for the following four characteristics:

    • First, do they hold your assets in segregated wallets, and do they share the public wallet address with you? This makes it possible for you to verify your holdings at any time.
    • Second, have they undergone and passed security audits, like the international information security management standards (ISO)?
    • Third, are they insured for loss of assets (whether via cybercrime or internal mismanagement)?
    • And fourth - are they licensed to operate in your jurisdiction? This lessens the likelihood of a rapid departure and de-platforming of you, the customer, in case of regulatory issues.

    While there are many more elements to consider depending on your crypto asset strategy, these are paramount to selecting a secure custodial partner. As crypto asset adoption surges, service providers offering secure custody are absolutely essential to a healthy, secure ecosystem. To avoid further scams like that of FTX, the industry must evolve how we approach custody and not only rely on sole custodial control - not if we want true mass adoption of crypto assets.

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Telegram WhatsApp

    About the author

    Marc Taverner
    • Website
    • LinkedIn

    Marc Taverner is the CEO and co-founder of XEROF, a leading Swiss financial services provider specialising in cryptoassets. He brings more than 30 years of experience in the tech and internet industries to XEROF’s global operations. Most recently, Marc led INATBA, one of the largest multi-stakeholder blockchain trade associations, backed by the European Commission and Abu Dhabi Global Market. He also served on the management team at Bitfury, a pioneering company in cryptoasset mining, hardware and chip design, and groundbreaking blockchain solutions.

    Related Articles

    Analysis by Bitget Research on Bitcoin quantum computing risks, ECDSA exposure, NIST post-quantum standards, and BIP-360 migration paths.

    Bitcoin quantum computing: What recent developments mean for network security

    XRPL validator analyzes quantum risk: only 0.03% of XRP supply is exposed, compared to up to 35% for Bitcoin. Google sets 2029 deadline.

    Quantum risk: Is XRP more secure than Bitcoin?

    Power Shift in Crypto Exchanges: Retail Overtakes Institutional

    Trump would sign the CLARITY Act immediately. But the Senate is blocking it, and a May deadline could push the law back to 2030.
    27. April 2026

    Trump wants to sign CLARITY Act immediately, but chances drop to 50%

    CVJ.CH Weekly review calendar week
    25. April 2026

    Weekly review calendar week 17 – 2026

    JPMorgan warns: Recurring DeFi exploits and stagnant ETH-denominated TVL curb institutional engagement in the DeFi sector.
    24. April 2026

    JPMorgan: DeFi hacks and TVL losses weigh on institutional investors

    twitter image button instagram image button linkedin image button youtube image button

    About Crypto Valley Journal
    About Crypto Valley Journal

    On the pulse of the movement

    • Academy
    • Contact
    • Advertising
    • About us
    • Partner
    • Imprint
    • Privacy
    • Disclaimer
    Search

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.