Close Menu
Crypto Valley Journal
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Crypto Valley Journal
    • Hot Topics
      • News
      • Minds
    • Focus
      • Background
      • Blockchain
      • Legal & Compliance
      • Non-Fungible Token (NFTs)
    • Investing
      • Markets
      • Financial Products
      • Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
      • Exchange overview
    • Education
      • Basics
      • Glossary
      • Politicians on crypto
    • Statistics
      • Bitcoin-ETF-Flows
      • Ethereum-ETF-Flows
      • Crypto market data
      • On-chain data
    • Academy
      • Overview
      • Part 1: Blockchain
      • Part 2: Money
      • Part 3: Bitcoin
      • Part 4: Cryptocurrencies
      • Part 5: Decentralized Finance
      • Part 6: Investing
    • English
      • Deutsch
    Crypto Valley Journal
    You are at:Home » Glossary » 51% Attack
    51% attack

    51% Attack

    By Editorial Office CVJ.CH on 6. March 2024 Glossary

    A 51% attack refers to an individual or entity taking over more than half of a network's mining hashrate, or computing power. Controlling more than 51% of a blockchain network gives the controlling party the power to alter incoming transaction data. This type of attack is referred to as a 51% attack.

    A 51% attack can prevent other miners from completing their respective blocks. Attackers can redirect new transactions, spend coins twice, and manipulate transactions in various ways. However, a 51% attack is not able to reverse older transactions that have already been completed or drain funds from users' wallets.

    Understanding the 51% attack

    Each blockchain has a sequence of blocks for recording transactions, known as the distributed ledger. These blocks are cryptographically linked. In proof-of-work (PoW) systems, miners solve complex problems and add new blocks of transactions to the blockchain network. If an individual or group of individuals secure more than 50% of the network's hashrate, or computing power, the blockchain system can be voluntarily influenced or attacked.

    For large and established blockchains, such as the Bitcoin network, controlling more than 50% of the network can be extremely difficult and presents a significant financial and technical barrier. A 51% attack is also possible in Proof of Stake (PoS) systems, where malicious attackers would need to control more than half of the circulating blockchain currency. For Ethereum, this equates to approximately $205 billion at the time of writing. This is because larger, more established and decentralised networks have a high level of security, making it infeasible for most malicious actors.

    Preventing a 51% attack

    There are several strategies that can be employed to prevent a blockchain network from being vulnerable to this type of attack. First, it is crucial to ensure that no single entity controls the majority of the network. Keeping miners decentralised reduces the risk of a 51% attack and, in general, of being controlled by a centralised entity. Secondly, miners can opt for ASIC mining equipment, which provides a high security threshold due to it's high mining hash. Finally, Proof-of-Stake (POS) and other alternative consensus protocols allow the user with a large stake to become a validator. These more recently developed consensus protocols have algorithmic mechanisms to quickly identify and stop attackers, resulting in penalties (slashing) and exclusion of the bad actors.

    The high value stored in certain cryptocurrencies provides a strong economic incentive to exploit the system. Therefore, the decentralised nature of cryptocurrencies is a common ethos in the blockchain community and mandates constant vigilance and self-sovereignty to protect against bad actors and work towards a decentralised and sectoral system.

    Basics
    24. September 2026

    Unit bias in crypto: Why cheap coins mislead investors

    Unit bias leads crypto investors to favor low-priced coins. Why unit price is misleading and why market capitalization matters.

    The Chainalysis Crypto Crime Report puts illicit activity below 1% of on-chain volume, countering the myth of Bitcoin as a criminal currency. Basics
    23. September 2026

    Myth: Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies mainly serve criminal activity

    The Chainalysis Crypto Crime Report puts illicit activity below 1% of on-chain volume, countering the myth of Bitcoin as a criminal currency.

    Zcash hides transaction data with zk-SNARK proofs and now sits between a US spot ETF listing and the EU privacy coin ban of 2027.
    22. September 2026

    What is the privacy coin Zcash (ZEC)?

    The Trezor data breach at fulfillment provider ShipMonk exposed names, addresses and phone numbers of 13,689 customers.
    21. September 2026

    Hardware wallet comparison 2026: Ledger vs. Trezor – new models, new risks

    The Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Cluster rated 62 EIPs and set December 2029 as the target for a quantum-safe Ethereum base layer.
    8. September 2026

    Ethereum targets a quantum-safe blockchain by 2029

    Bitcoin near USD 78,000 and stablecoin supply above USD 300 billion shape the crypto market outlook heading into Q4 2026.
    2. September 2026

    The signals to watch: a crypto market outlook for Q4 2026

    Liquidity depth, custody controls, latency, capital efficiency and dedicated support decide which venues institutional traders actually approve.
    28. August 2026

    5 infrastructure requirements institutional traders demand from crypto venues

    Cardano's DReps are 24 percentage points short before the deadline, while Solana's quorum rule contradicts its own governance framework.
    27. August 2026

    Cardano and Solana: The weaknesses of on-chain governance

    Popular Posts
    About Crypto Valley Journal
    About Crypto Valley Journal

    On the pulse of the movement

    • Academy
    • Contact
    • Advertising
    • About us
    • Partner
    • Imprint
    • Privacy
    • Disclaimer
    Search

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.